LinkedIn post
934 / 3000
Most boards I sit with treat OT security as a special category — an "engineering issue" the CISO will handle, distinct from the cyber risk reviewed quarterly. That framing was reasonable a decade ago. Five priority points from the full essay: ▸ OT security is now a board-level risk in any business with industrial assets — not a back-office concern. ▸ The five priority questions every board should be asking are about asset visibility, third-party access, segmentation, monitoring, and incident response — in that order. ▸ CISOs typically over-report on tooling and under-report on residual risk closure. That's the opposite of what boards need. ▸ Regulatory compliance does not equal OT security. They overlap maybe 60% in mature sectors, less elsewhere. The full 2500-word essay walks through frameworks, war stories, and FAQs. Link in first comment. #OTSecurity #IndustrialSecurity #BoardGovernance #CorporateGovernance #ICS
Tip: Paste into LinkedIn's compose box. Open compose with this URL pre-filled (LinkedIn pulls the OG card automatically).
First comment (LINK GOES HERE)
Read the full pillar essay: https://matthewcarr.com/insights/ot-security-for-boards?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share Or download as a board pre-read PDF (one-click) on the page.
Why first-comment-link: LinkedIn's algorithm penalises external links in main posts. Putting the link in the first comment consistently produces 2-3x higher reach than in-post links.
Twitter thread (4 TWEETS)
01 / 04
200 / 280
Most boards I sit with treat OT security as a special category — an "engineering issue" the CISO will handle, distinct from the cyber risk reviewed quarterly. That framing was reasonable a decade ago.
02 / 04
404 / 280
▸ OT security is now a board-level risk in any business with industrial assets — not a back-office concern. ▸ The five priority questions every board should be asking are about asset visibility, third-party access, segmentation, monitoring, and incident response — in that order. ▸ CISOs typically over-report on tooling and under-report on residual risk closure. That's the opposite of what boards need.
03 / 04
107 / 280
Regulatory compliance does not equal OT security. They overlap maybe 60% in mature sectors, less elsewhere.
04 / 04
123 / 280
Full essay: https://matthewcarr.com/insights/ot-security-for-boards?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
Email summary
Pillar Essay: OT Security for Boards: The Questions Directors Should Ask What audit committees and executive teams need on the table — and what their CISOs rarely bring on their own. Most boards I sit with treat OT security as a special category — an "engineering issue" the CISO will handle, distinct from the cyber risk reviewed quarterly. That framing was reasonable a decade ago. It is no longer. TLDR: · OT security is now a board-level risk in any business with industrial assets — not a back-office concern. · The five priority questions every board should be asking are about asset visibility, third-party access, segmentation, monitoring, and incident response — in that order. · CISOs typically over-report on tooling and under-report on residual risk closure. That's the opposite of what boards need. · Regulatory compliance does not equal OT security. They overlap maybe 60% in mature sectors, less elsewhere. Full essay (and free PDF version): https://matthewcarr.com/insights/ot-security-for-boards
For when you want to forward to a specific contact (CISO, board-chair friend, journalist) with a personal note.
Share card preview

LinkedIn, Slack, iMessage, Bluesky, and Mastodon will all pull this image automatically when they see the URL. No manual upload needed.
HASHTAGS USED
#OTSecurity #IndustrialSecurity #BoardGovernance #CorporateGovernance #ICS